High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Incomplete Hotel Project Held as Short-Term Capital Asset. The court held that the period of holding of an incomplete building under construction cannot be added to the period of holding of the land for determining long-term capital gains under Section 2(42A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Commissioner of Income Tax appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had held that the profit from sale of an incomplete hotel project was a long-term capital gain. The respondent-assessee, Hindustan Hotels Ltd., had taken a perpetual lease of land in 1988 and commenced construction of a hotel in 1990. Due to lack of funds, the construction remained incomplete and the entire project (land and partly constructed building) was sold in June 1995 for Rs. 11 crores. The assessee claimed the profit as long-term capital gain, but the Assessing Officer treated it as short-term capital gain on the ground that the building was not held for more than 36 months. The CIT (Appeals) upheld the Assessing Officer's view, but the Tribunal reversed it, holding that the land and building together constituted a single capital asset and the period of holding should be reckoned from the date of acquisition of the land. The High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the land and building are separate capital assets. The building under construction was not held for more than 36 months, and its period of holding cannot be added to that of the land. The profit on sale of the incomplete hotel project was correctly assessed as short-term capital gain. The court set aside the Tribunal's order and restored the order of the Assessing Officer.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Capital Gains - Short Term vs Long Term - Section 2(42A), Section 45, Income Tax Act, 1961 - The issue was whether the period of holding of an incomplete building under construction can be added to the period of holding of the land for determining long-term capital gains. The court held that the land and building are separate capital assets; the building under construction was not held for more than 36 months, and its period of holding cannot be clubbed with that of the land. The profit on sale of the incomplete hotel project was correctly assessed as short-term capital gain. (Paras 1-10)

B) Income Tax - Capital Asset - Composite Sale - Section 2(14), Income Tax Act, 1961 - The court held that when land and building are sold together, each asset must be considered separately for the purpose of computing capital gains. The period of holding of the building cannot be deemed to be the same as that of the land merely because they were sold as a composite project. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the profit arising from the sale of an incomplete hotel project (land with partly constructed building) is a short-term capital gain or a long-term capital gain under the Income Tax Act, 1961?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is set aside and the order of the Assessing Officer is restored. The profit of Rs. 7,80,05,356 is held to be short-term capital gain.

Law Points

  • Period of holding of building under construction cannot be added to period of holding of land
  • Capital asset must be held as a whole for more than 36 months
  • Incomplete building is a separate asset from land
  • Section 2(42A) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961 interpretation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (10) 140

TAX APPEAL NO. 59 OF 2002

2010-10-29

D. G. KARNIK, F.M. REIS

Ms. Asha Dessai for Appellant, Mr. P. J. Pardiwalla with Mr. V. Korgaonkar for Respondent No.1

The Commissioner of Income Tax

M/s Hindustan Hotels Ltd. and The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Tax appeal by Revenue against order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding classification of capital gain as short-term or long-term.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside Tribunal's order and restore Assessing Officer's assessment treating profit as short-term capital gain.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by Tribunal's decision holding that profit from sale of incomplete hotel project was long-term capital gain.

Previous Decisions

Assessing Officer held profit as short-term capital gain; CIT (Appeals) upheld; Tribunal reversed holding it as long-term capital gain.

Issues

Whether the profit from sale of an incomplete hotel project (land with partly constructed building) is short-term or long-term capital gain? Whether the period of holding of the building under construction can be added to the period of holding of the land for determining long-term capital gains?

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that the building under construction was not held for more than 36 months, hence profit is short-term capital gain. Assessee argued that land and building together constitute a single capital asset, and period of holding should be from date of acquisition of land.

Ratio Decidendi

Land and building are separate capital assets. The period of holding of an incomplete building under construction cannot be added to the period of holding of the land. For determining whether a capital gain is short-term or long-term, each asset must be considered separately. The building not held for more than 36 months results in short-term capital gain.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondent is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The Assessing Officer held that what the assessee had transferred was a land with a building which was incomplete. The hotel building which was under construction was not held by the assessee for a period of more than three years and therefore the profit arising on sale of the incomplete hotel project was a short term capital gain.

Procedural History

Assessing Officer assessed profit as short-term capital gain. Assessee appealed to CIT (Appeals) who upheld the assessment. Assessee further appealed to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which reversed and held it as long-term capital gain. Revenue filed this appeal before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 2(42A), 45, 2(14)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Incomplete Hotel Project Held as Short-Term Capital Asset. The court held that the period of holding of an incomplete building under construction cannot be added to the p...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay HC Quashes Tribunal Order in MPSC Recruitment Dispute. The Bombay High Court rules against selective re-evaluation for EWS candidates, preserving MPSC’s recruitment results.