High Court of Karnataka Quashes BDA's Cancellation of Site Allotment for Violation of Natural Justice — Purchaser from Original Allottee Not Given Hearing Before Termination. The court held that the cancellation order was passed without affording an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice, and directed the BDA to hear the petitioner before passing any fresh order.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath Shetty, purchased site No.196/B in HSR Layout, Bangalore, from the original allottee. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a cancellation order dated 27.02.2015 terminating the allotment of the site without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the cancellation order. The court noted that the impugned order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not heard before the decision was made. The court held that the BDA's action was unsustainable and quashed the cancellation order, directing the BDA to hear the petitioner and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Cancellation of Allotment - The BDA cancelled the allotment of a site without issuing any notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, who had purchased the site from the original allottee. The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and quashed the same, directing the BDA to hear the petitioner before passing any fresh order. (Paras 1-4)

B) Property Law - Transfer of Property - Rights of Purchaser from Original Allottee - The petitioner, as a purchaser of the site from the original allottee, had a legitimate expectation of being heard before the cancellation of the allotment. The court recognized that the petitioner's interest in the property was affected by the cancellation order. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of allotment of a site by the BDA without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, who is a purchaser from the original allottee, is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned cancellation order dated 27.02.2015 (Annexure-E) is quashed. The BDA is directed to hear the petitioner and pass a fresh order in accordance with law, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Audi alteram partem
  • Cancellation of allotment without notice
  • Writ of certiorari
  • Bangalore Development Authority Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (12) 12

Writ Petition No.17381/2015 (BDA)

2017-12-08

B. Veerappa

Sri H.T. Vasanth Kumar for petitioner, Sri Sachin B.S. for respondent 1

Sri Manjunath Shetty

Bangalore Development Authority and Sri M. Munikrishnappa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of site allotment by BDA.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of cancellation order dated 27.02.2015 issued by BDA.

Filing Reason

Cancellation of allotted site without notice or hearing to the petitioner.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of allotment without affording an opportunity of hearing is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the cancellation order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

An order cancelling an allotment without affording an opportunity of hearing to the affected party is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner who is the purchaser of the schedule property to the writ petition from the original allottee is before this Court for a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned cancellation order... The impugned order has been passed without issuing any notice or affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner... Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be quashed on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cancellation order dated 27.02.2015 issued by the BDA. The matter came up for preliminary hearing 'B' group and was disposed of on 08.12.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes BDA's Cancellation of Site Allotment for Violation of Natural Justice — Purchaser from Original Allottee Not Given Hearing Before Termination. The court held that the cancellation order was passed without affording a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act – Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years. Reservation of land for public purpose lapses as acquiring body failed to take steps within prescribed period under Section 12...