Search Results for "village panchayat"

1799 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1799 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Divisional Commissioner's Order Setting Aside Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member. Encroachment on Gairan Land Allotted to Public Works Department Constitutes Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Ashruba Dhondiba Gade, was a member of the Village Panchayat of Gambhirwadi. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Rajendra Shankar Sutar and Manda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Construction Licence and NOC in Goa Panchayat Raj Act Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Violation of Statutory Provisions or Bye-Laws. Writ of Mandamus Denied as Petitioner Did Not Demonstrate Legal Right or Duty Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Mr. Umesh Pundlik Pednekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dansinh Rupsinh Parmar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Second Fast Track Court, Amreli in Special Case (ACB) No. 47/19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Issues Rule and Hears PIL Concerning Alleged Illegal Encroachment on Comunidade Land in Serula. Petitioners Claimed Violation of Code of Comunidades and Sought Quashing of Regularization Orders.

The matter involved two Public Interest Litigation writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, alleging large‑scale illegal encroac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Election Dispute Must Be Raised via Election Petition, Not Under Article 226.

The petitioner, Gokul Chandanmal Sangvi, a defeated candidate in the Sarpanch election of Grampanchayat Fagne, filed a writ petition under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Delimitation of Grampanchayat Wards as Barred by Article 243-O. The Court Holds That After Objections Were Heard and Election Process Commenced, Only Remedy is Election Petition Under Article 243-O(b).

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the formation of wards and reservation of seats in Grampanchayat Chale, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Issues Rule in PIL Challenging Encroachment and Regularisation of Comunidade Lands; Petitioners Allege Violation of Code of Comunidades and Favouritism to Minister.

Two Public Interest Litigation writ petitions (PIL WP No. 15 of 2014 and PIL WP No. 16 of 2014) were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Against Village Panchayat for Violation of Natural Justice — Notice Required Before Adverse Administrative Action Under Goa Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1988. Hoarding Removal Order Set Aside as Panchayat Was Not Given Prior Hearing.

The Village Panchayat of Calangute and its Sarpanch filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 12th January 2005 passed by the Collector and Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cellular Company's Petition Against Panchayat Orders for Demolition of Telecom Tower. Held that a mobile phone tower is not a 'building' under Section 135 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and the Panchayat lacked jurisdiction to require prior permission or order removal.

The petitioner, Bharti Cellular Ltd., a cellular service provider, installed a mobile phone tower on the terrace of a building in Navelim, Goa. The Vi...