Search Results for "partner's share"

707 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 707 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.

The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced for Death of Pillion Rider. Income of Deceased Reassessed at Rs. 1,500 per Month with Multiplier of 15 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, being the parents and brother of the deceased Pravin Bapusaheb Patil, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Partnership Claim Fails for Lack of Registration. Relationship of landlord and tenant established by payment of rent and acceptance, not partnership.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Additional District Judge, Nasik dated 3.10.1992, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Letters of Administration — Will Proved by Attesting Witness Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Court Held That the Propounder Removed All Suspicious Circumstances and the Will Was Genuine.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a single judge granting Letters of Administration to the respondent, Rakesh Phoolchand Jain, in respect of the las...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...