Search Results for "contract void"

1828 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1828 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Debt or Liability Must Be Legally Enforceable on the Date of Cheque Issuance Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, M. Shantilal & Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Void Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. Agreement executed during non-alienation period is void ab initio and not enforceable even after the restriction period ends.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had upheld the decre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Consent Decree Challenge — Separate Suit to Set Aside Consent Decree on Ground of Illegality Not Maintainable. Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC Bars Such Suit; Appellate Court's Judgment Set Aside as Perverse.

The dispute originated from a suit for eviction (R.C.S. No.62/78) between the parties, who are relatives, concerning a structure/taverna in Survey No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Human Rights Commission Order Directing Allotment of Flat by MHADA. Commission lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate proprietary rights under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), a statutory authority for housing development in Maharashtra, challenged a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Grants Leave to Continue Proceedings in Specific Performance Suit. Transfer of Property During Pendency of Lis Pendens Does Not Affect Rights of Parties Under Order 22 Rule 4 and Rule 10 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed Suit No. 1166 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement for sale concerning a suit property. The suit w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.

The appellant, Harish, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 05.12.2008 allegedly executed by the respondents in his fav...