Bombay High Court Quashes Human Rights Commission Order Directing Allotment of Flat by MHADA. Commission lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate proprietary rights under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), a statutory authority for housing development in Maharashtra, challenged an order dated 22nd October 2009 passed by the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission. The Commission had directed MHADA to allot a residential flat of a certain restriction in a specified area at a specified price within three months to the applicant (Respondent No.2). MHADA contended that the Commission lacked jurisdiction to entertain the complaint as it pertained to proprietary rights, not human rights. The High Court examined the definition of 'human rights' under Section 2(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, which includes rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution. The court held that the right to allotment of a flat at a particular price is a proprietary right, not a human right. The Commission's jurisdiction under Section 12 is limited to inquiring into complaints of human rights violations. The court quashed the Commission's order, holding that the Commission had exceeded its jurisdiction. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Human Rights Law - Jurisdiction of Human Rights Commission - Proprietary Rights - The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 by directing MHADA to allot a flat to a citizen, as the matter involved proprietary rights and not human rights. The Commission can only inquire into complaints relating to human rights violations, not civil or contractual rights. (Paras 3-5)

B) Human Rights Law - Definition of Human Rights - Section 2(d) of Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Human rights are defined as rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution. The right to allotment of a flat at a specified price is a proprietary right and does not fall within this definition. (Para 4)

C) Constitutional Law - Right to Housing - Article 21 of Constitution of India - While the right to shelter is part of the right to life under Article 21, the right to a particular flat at a particular price is not a human right but a contractual or statutory right. The Commission cannot enforce such specific performance. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission has jurisdiction to pass an order directing a statutory authority to allot a residential flat to a citizen, which pertains to proprietary rights rather than human rights.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order of the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission dated 22nd October 2009, and made the rule absolute.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Human Rights Commission
  • Proprietary rights not human rights
  • Scope of Section 12 of Protection of Human Rights Act
  • 1993
  • Distinction between human rights and civil rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (02) 43

Writ Petition No.10453 of 2009

2010-02-17

Smt. Roshan Dalvi, J.

Mr. G.W. Mattos for Petitioner, Ms. Sai M. Dalvi (Respondent No.2 in person), Mrs. Neha Bhide for Respondent No.3

Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA)

The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission directing allotment of flat

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the Commission's order dated 22nd October 2009

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged jurisdiction of Human Rights Commission to pass order relating to proprietary rights

Previous Decisions

Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission passed order on 22nd October 2009 directing MHADA to allot a flat to Respondent No.2

Issues

Whether the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission has jurisdiction to pass an order directing allotment of a flat, which involves proprietary rights, under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner (MHADA) argued that the Commission lacks jurisdiction to entertain complaints relating to proprietary rights, as human rights under Section 2(d) of the Act are limited to rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity. Respondent No.2 argued in person that the Commission's order was valid and should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission has no jurisdiction to pass orders relating to proprietary rights such as allotment of a flat at a specified price, as such matters do not fall within the definition of 'human rights' under Section 2(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The Commission's power under Section 12 is limited to inquiring into complaints of human rights violations.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner has challenged the order of the learned Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission, Mumbai dated 22nd October 2009 directing the applicant which is a Statutory Authority for Housing Development in the State of Maharashtra, to allot a residential flat of a certain restriction in a certain area at the specified price within 3 months of the date of hearing. The Petitioner(MHADA) challenges the jurisdiction of the Human Rights Commission to issue an order relating to the proprietary right of citizens.

Procedural History

The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission passed an order on 22nd October 2009 directing MHADA to allot a flat to Respondent No.2. MHADA challenged this order by filing Writ Petition No.10453 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court. The High Court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 27th January 2010, pronouncing it on 17th February 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993: Section 2(d), Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Human Rights Commission Order Directing Allotment of Flat by MHADA. Commission lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate proprietary rights under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Succession Certificate to Second Wife and Children Under Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Second Marriage Valid as First Wife Consented Due to Infertility.