Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1983 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1983 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Oral Partition. Court holds that finding of oral partition in 1958 was perverse and that the Appellate Court erred in assuming that the deceased father acted as Karta of joint family.

This is a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Shankar Ganpati Jagtap, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Petition of Accused Convicted Under Section 324 IPC for Causing Hurt with Axe and Stick. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Revision Under Section 397 CrPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by two accused, Hioraj alias Yovraj Bandu Shende and Dulichand alias Dularam Bandu Shende, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld as Complaint Did Not Disclose Prima Facie Case.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law found under Section 100 CPC, as courts below correctly decreed possession and mesne profits under Order XX Rule 12 CPC.

The case arises from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff (now represented by respondents) against the original def...