Search Results for "Section 31(4)"

531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Power Supply Dispute Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Debt under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 not recoverable via winding up when substantial defense exists.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited, filed a company petition seeking winding up of the respondent, Global Energy Private Limited, under Section 433(e) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Medical Examination of Dementia Patient in Guardianship Petition Under Parens Patriae Jurisdiction. Son and Daughter Seek Guardian Appointment for Mother; Article 226 Petition Invoked to Protect Vulnerable Person.

This matter involved a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India invoking the doctrine of parens patriae by petitioners, who are t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Lease Renewal Case Due to Failure to Exercise Option Within Stipulated Time. Time Held to Be Essence of Contract in Option for Renewal of Lease; Equity Does Not Relieve Tenant from Own Neglect Absent Special Circumstances.

The dispute arose from a lease of land in Calcutta where the appellant, Caltex (India) Ltd., held a ten-year lease from the respondent, Bhagwan Devi M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions of Contractual Teachers Challenging Termination Under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan. Teachers appointed on contract basis have no right to regularization; government policy decision to discontinue scheme is valid.

The petitioners, contractual teachers appointed under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (formerly Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), challenged their termination by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Granting Additional Increments to Graduate Employees Promoted to Clerks in BEST Undertaking. The court held that BCR No.19 applies to all graduate clerks, including those promoted from lower categories, and denial amounts to unfair labour practice.

The case involves a challenge by the BEST Undertaking against an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 20 March 2021, in Complaint (ULP) No. 49...