Search Results for "Punjab Civil Services Rules"

1199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Regularization of Services of Shikshan Sevaks in Zilla Parishad Schools — Directs State to Frame Policy for Regularization Within Six Months.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by a group of Shikshan Sevaks (teachers on probation) appointed in Zilla Parishad schools in Solapur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Job Contract Pension Case — Sets Aside High Court Order Counting Entire Service for Pension. Only limited job-contract service sufficient to render eligibility for pension can be counted under Rule 18(6) of Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992.

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of appeals filed by the State of Odisha challenging the orders of the Orissa High Court that had dismissed the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals Seeking Mandamus Against Regulatory Authorities for Data Breach Complaint — No Statutory Duty Established Under IT Act or Insurance Laws.

The appellant, Himanshu Pathak, proprietor of CyberX9, filed six writ petitions before the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Co-defendant in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Deletion of Party Ordered Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Co-defendant Against Whom No Relief Claimed is Not a Necessary Party.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a suit filed by Vidharbha Enterprises (plaintiff) against the Union of India and BSNL (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in OAS Recruitment Case — No Right Accrues from Mere Recommendation. Mere recommendation for promotion does not confer a vested right; abolition of cadre and repeal of rules extinguishes any claim.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court which had directed the State to conve...