Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Regularization of Services of Shikshan Sevaks in Zilla Parishad Schools — Directs State to Frame Policy for Regularization Within Six Months.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 45
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by a group of Shikshan Sevaks (teachers on probation) appointed in Zilla Parishad schools in Solapur district. The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to regularize their services and grant them consequential benefits. The court noted that the petitioners were appointed as Shikshan Sevaks under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Primary Education) Service Rules, 1961, and had completed their probation period. The State Government had not framed a policy for regularization despite earlier directions. The court held that the State is duty-bound to frame a policy for regularization of Shikshan Sevaks who have completed probation and are working continuously. It directed the State to frame a policy within six months and consider regularization of the petitioners' services in accordance with law. The petitions were allowed with the above directions.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Regularization - Shikshan Sevak - Zilla Parishad Schools - Petitioners appointed as Shikshan Sevaks under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Primary Education) Service Rules, 1961 - They sought regularization of services and consequential benefits - Court held that the State Government is duty-bound to frame a policy for regularization of Shikshan Sevaks who have completed probation period and are working continuously - Directed the State to frame a policy within six months and consider regularization of petitioners' services in accordance with law (Paras 1-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, appointed as Shikshan Sevaks (teachers on probation) in Zilla Parishad schools, are entitled to regularization of their services and consequential benefits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the State of Maharashtra to frame a policy for regularization of Shikshan Sevaks within six months and consider regularization of the petitioners' services in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Regularization of service
  • Shikshan Sevak
  • Zilla Parishad
  • Education Department
  • Policy direction
  • Writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-KOL:2662-DB

Writ Petition No. 7346 of 2025 and Writ Petition No. 11630 of 2025

2025-11-21

M. S. Karnik, Ajit B. Kadethankar

2025:BHC-KOL:2662-DB

Ms. B. R. Mangle (through V.C.) for the Petitioner; Mr. Siddheswhar B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State

Balasaheb Nagnath Gore and others (in WP 7346/2025); Ganga Shivaji Katule and others (in WP 11630/2025)

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking regularization of services of Shikshan Sevaks appointed in Zilla Parishad schools.

Remedy Sought

Writ of mandamus directing the State to regularize the services of the petitioners and grant consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

The petitioners, appointed as Shikshan Sevaks, had completed their probation period but their services were not regularized by the State.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to regularization of their services as Shikshan Sevaks. Whether the State is duty-bound to frame a policy for regularization of Shikshan Sevaks.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were appointed as Shikshan Sevaks under the relevant rules and had completed probation, but their services were not regularized. Respondent-State argued that regularization is a policy matter and the State is considering the issue.

Ratio Decidendi

The State Government is duty-bound to frame a policy for regularization of Shikshan Sevaks who have completed their probation period and are working continuously. The court can issue a writ of mandamus directing the State to frame such a policy.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the State Government is duty-bound to frame a policy for regularization of Shikshan Sevaks who have completed probation period and are working continuously.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, and were heard together.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis (Primary Education) Service Rules, 1961:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Setting Aside of Ex Parte Preliminary Decree in Redemption Suit — Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Maintainable. The court held that a decree passed after defendants were proceeded ex parte under Order 9 Rule 6(1)(a) and the court proceede...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Regularization of Services of Shikshan Sevaks in Zilla Parishad Schools — Directs State to Frame Policy for Regularization Within Six Months.