WRIT PETITION NO.16958 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"
678 result(s) found
Found 678 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Returning Plaint in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute, Finding Trial Court Erred in Not Deciding Jurisdiction Preliminary Issue. Full Bench Decision in Tulsiwadi Navnirman Held Not to Bar Civil Suit; Allegations of Fraud Required Adjudication, and Vague Issue Framing Was Insufficient.
4 Jan 2017The appeal arose from an order of the City Civil Court at Bombay in a suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking declaratory and injunctionary ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Order Restricting Developer to G+4 Floors for Public Parking Lot, Finds Construction Substantially Progressed Under Section 51 MRTP Act. Court Holds Protection Under Proviso to Section 51(1) Available Once Operations Have Substantially Progressed, Not Just Substantially Completed.
9 Jul 2012The dispute arose from a development project on plot bearing Final Plot No. 46 of Town Planning Scheme-III at Shivaji Park, Mumbai, owned by Kohinoor ...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Construction Dispute — No Sanction Order Existed, No Estoppel Against Corporation. Plaintiffs failed to prove deemed sanction under Section 264 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 as no formal order was passed and no notice of revocation was issued.
3 Mar 2010The appellants, original plaintiffs, owned plot nos. 71/72, 70/2 and 70/3 on Sheet No. 67-D at Amravati. They filed Regular Civil Suit No. 193 of 1988...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Challenge to Re-Reservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Failure to Acquire Within Statutory Period. Re-reservation of land for playground and school after expiry of one year from lapsing of earlier reservation held invalid under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
4 Dec 2025The petitioners, Mukund Mohan Kurunbhatti and Subodh Motichand Bundelchandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Appeal in Township Development Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Developer. Court holds that trial court erred in granting injunction in favor of landowners without considering development agreement and power of attorney, and that balance of convenience favored the developer.
25 Oct 2023The appeal arises from an order dated 3 October 2022 passed by the 11th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, rejecting the appellant-plaintiff's a...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Irani Chawl Structures as Unauthorized Construction. Court upholds demolition by Municipal Corporation under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, finding no violation of natural justice as notice was affixed and opportunity of hearing was given.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, residents of Irani Chawl, Prabhadevi, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structures by the Municipal C...
- 257
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction on Khajuria Lake and Restoration of Water Body. Municipal Corporation and State Directed to Recover Costs from Erring Officers and Initiate Prosecution for Unauthorized Filling of 100-Year-Old Lake.
3 Aug 2018The petitioner, an Indian citizen and resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to demolish illegal construction on CT...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Town Planning Dispute — Section 149 MRTP Act Bar Not Applicable to Challenge of Betterment Charges Receipt. Suit Challenging Validity of Receipt and Seeking Proper Receipt Not Barred Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
18 Feb 2005The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay seeking a declaration that a receipt bearing No.88560 dated 24-5-1...
- 165
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Nagpur Municipal Corporation Challenging District Judge's Jurisdiction to Extend Notice Period Under MRTP Act. District Judge Has Jurisdiction Under Section 286(3) of City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 to Extend Notice Period for Notice Issued Under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act, 1966.
22 Feb 2012The Nagpur Municipal Corporation issued a notice to the respondent under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP A...
- 62
