Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Town Planning Dispute — Section 149 MRTP Act Bar Not Applicable to Challenge of Betterment Charges Receipt. Suit Challenging Validity of Receipt and Seeking Proper Receipt Not Barred Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay seeking a declaration that a receipt bearing No.88560 dated 24-5-1982 for betterment charges was illegal, bad and inoperative; a permanent injunction restraining the Municipal Corporation of Gr.Bombay from implementing certain notices; and a mandatory direction to the Corporation to issue a proper receipt for Rs.3,966/- paid as betterment charges in respect of final plot no.376 (O.P.No.377) T.P.IV A Mahim. The suit was contested by the respondent no.1 (Municipal Corporation). The trial court framed issues including whether the suit was barred by Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. By judgment and order dated 26th July 2001, the learned trial Judge held that the suit was barred by Section 149 and directed that the plaint be returned to the appellants for presentation to the proper forum. The appellants appealed against this order. The High Court, after hearing counsel, examined the prayers in the suit and the scope of Section 149. The court noted that the suit did not challenge the validity of the town planning scheme or any part thereof, but only challenged the validity of a receipt and sought a direction to issue a proper receipt. The court held that Section 149 bars only suits challenging the validity of a town planning scheme or any part thereof, and does not bar a suit of the present nature. Accordingly, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the trial court's order, and directed the trial court to proceed with the suit in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Bar of Suit - Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The suit sought declaration that a receipt for betterment charges was illegal and a direction to issue a proper receipt. The trial court held the suit barred under Section 149. The High Court reversed, holding that Section 149 bars only suits challenging the validity of a town planning scheme or any part thereof, and does not bar a suit challenging the validity of a receipt or seeking a direction to issue a proper receipt. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit filed by the appellants challenging the receipt for betterment charges and seeking a direction to issue a proper receipt is barred by Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 26th July 2001 is set aside. The trial court is directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966 does not bar a suit challenging the validity of a receipt for betterment charges or seeking a direction to issue a proper receipt
  • as such reliefs are not covered by the bar under Section 149 which only applies to challenges to the validity of a town planning scheme or any part thereof.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (02) 154

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1107 of 2001

2005-02-18

A.S. Oka, J.

Mr.S.H.Thatte i/b Thatte and co. for Appellants, Mrs Vidya Khatu for B.M.C.

Jagadish Hari Thatte, Suresh Hari Thatte, Chandrakant Hari Thatte, Ravindra Hari Thatte, Mrs Saral Waman Saraf, Mrs. Shakuntala Sudhakar Nerurkar, Mrs Sunanda Achyut Oka

The Municipal Corporatio of Gr.Bombay, The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal from order returning plaint for presentation to proper forum on ground of bar under Section 149 of MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside trial court's order returning plaint and to proceed with suit.

Filing Reason

Trial court held suit barred by Section 149 of MRTP Act.

Previous Decisions

Trial court by judgment and order dated 26th July 2001 directed return of plaint.

Issues

Whether the suit challenging the validity of a receipt for betterment charges and seeking a direction to issue a proper receipt is barred by Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the suit did not challenge the validity of the town planning scheme or any part thereof, but only challenged the validity of a receipt and sought a direction to issue a proper receipt. Respondent argued that the suit was barred by Section 149.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 bars only suits challenging the validity of a town planning scheme or any part thereof. A suit challenging the validity of a receipt for betterment charges or seeking a direction to issue a proper receipt does not fall within the bar under Section 149.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Trial Judge held that the suit filed by the Appellants was barred by Section 149 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The suit does not challenge the validity of the town planning scheme or any part thereof. The suit only challenges the validity of the receipt and seeks a direction to issue a proper receipt.

Procedural History

Appellants filed suit in City Civil Court at Bombay. Trial court framed issues including whether suit was barred by Section 149 of MRTP Act. By judgment and order dated 26th July 2001, trial court held suit barred and directed return of plaint. Appellants appealed to High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Town Planning Dispute — Section 149 MRTP Act Bar Not Applicable to Challenge of Betterment Charges Receipt. Suit Challenging Validity of Receipt and Seeking Proper Receipt Not Barred Under...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eligibility of Members to Vote in Cooperative Society Elections. Membership Duration Under Section 27(3-A) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Computed from Date of Enrollment or Resolution ...