Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for reassessment of derivative transaction loss set aside as Assessing Officer had already examined the issue during original assessment.

The petitioner, Shrikant Phulchand Bhakkad (HUF), through its Karta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Penalty Under Central Sales Tax Act for Alleged Misuse of Declared Forms. Court holds that penalty under Section 10(d) read with Section 10A of the CST Act, 1956 cannot be imposed without establishing mens rea or conscious violation of law.

The petitioner, M/s. Brijda Roadlines Pvt. Ltd., a transport company engaged in the business of transporting goods and holding a dealership from Bhara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...