CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012
29 Jan 2016...
Search Results for "Collector permission"
1789 result(s) found
Found 1789 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition for Regularization of Services of Gram Panchayat Employee; Examines Applicability of Umadevi (2006) 4 SCC 1 to Long-Serving Gram Panchayat Employees.
10 Dec 2025The petitioner, a retired Gram Panchayat employee, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Goa University's Challenge to Town Planning Board Directions and Allows Dr. Shetye's Complaint Regarding Illegal Compound Wall. The Court held that the University's construction of a compound wall without leaving access to neighboring properties was unauthorized and that the regularization order did not legalize the wall without proper plans.
25 Nov 2024The judgment concerns two writ petitions: WP No.414/2023 filed by Goa University challenging an order of the Town and Country Planning Board dated 20....
- 414
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Stop-Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Naval NOC Requirement for Building Construction. Petitioners Challenged Requirement as Ultra Vires MRTP Act After Obtaining IOD and Commencement Certificate Without Such Condition.
27 Feb 2019The petitioners, a co-operative housing society and a developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court challenging a st...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Collector's Order Granting Permission to Issue Quit Notice in Rent Control Matter — Lack of Evidence for Landlord's Claim Under C.P. and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949. Appellate Authority Cannot Reverse Rent Controller's Finding Without Evidence; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.
2 Feb 2006The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the order of the Additional Collector, Amravati, which granted permission to the respondent-landlord (Hindu Child...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Restoring Tenancy Declaration Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Landlords' Admission of Cultivation Constitutes Conclusive Proof of Tenancy. The court quashed the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order and restored the concurrent findings of the Tahsildar and Sub-Divisional Officer declaring the petitioner as a tenant under Section 70(B) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
3 Jun 2019The petitioner, Shobha Daulatrao Bankar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 07.05.2016 passed by the Member (Administrative) of the Mah...
- 256
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Development Permission Despite Pending Criminal Case Against Different Property Developer. The court held that a criminal case concerning a different property cannot be a valid ground to refuse development permission for a separate land under a valid development agreement.
14 Nov 2017The petitioners, M/s. Gurudaya Builders, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No. 3) to grant develo...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Change of User Charges and Premium Calculation — Directs Recalculation Based on Market Value at Time of Application. The court held that the Collector's quantification based on current market value was erroneous and must be based on market value prevalent when the application was made.
22 Dec 2023The petitioner, Ratilal Madan Waja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging lett...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Divisional Commissioner's Order Declaring Group Leader of BJP Municipal Party for Lack of Jurisdiction. Commissioner Cannot Decide Group Leadership Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1986 as Power is Limited to Disqualification of Members.
12 Aug 2022The petitioner, Bhagatram Ravalmal Balani, was elected as a councillor of the Jalgaon Municipal Corporation in 2018 on a BJP ticket. After the electio...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Order Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act — Review Not Maintainable. Petitioner failed to show any legal error in the Additional Commissioner's order upholding the Tahsildar's direction to remove obstruction from a way under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.
10 Mar 2010The petitioner, Lala Dagadu Kale, challenged the judgment and order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik in RTS revision app...
- 85
