Search Results for "executive act"

6479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Passport Impounding Orders — Violation of Natural Justice. Impounding under Section 10(3)(e) of Passports Act, 1967 set aside as no show cause notice or hearing was given.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals whose passports were impounded by the Passport Authority under Section 10(3)(e) of the P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.730 OF 2009

The four writ petitions arose from income tax assessment proceedings concerning the transfer of shares of Idea Cellular Limited (formerly Birla Commun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Illegal Detention in Chapter Proceedings — Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines. Petitioner awarded Rs. 25,000 for being detained over 24 hours without production before Magistrate in Chapter Proceeding No. 68/2005 under Section 107 of CrPC.

The petitioner, Balasaheb Sadanand Bhagat @ Bhakta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking compensa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Bar Bodies and Advocate, Holding Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act. Legal Profession is Sui Generis and Excluded from Definition of 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) which held that c...