Search Results for "directory rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "directory rules"

566 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 566 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim for Son of Deceased Employee Despite Delayed Application. Court holds that delay in making representation does not extinguish right to compassionate appointment if the claim is otherwise valid under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1967.

12 Apr 2022

The petitioners, Smt. Anita Bhujang Wagalgave and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking a writ of mandamus ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Suit Regarding Applicability of 120-Day Timeline for Written Statement. The mandatory timeline under Order V Rule 1 CPC as amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply to suits filed before the Act's enactment and subsequently transferred under Section 15.

28 Jan 2021

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. The su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Corporator Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Failure to Produce Valid Caste Certificate Leads to Disqualification Under Section 16(1A).

5 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Balchandra Shirsat, was elected as a corporator of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai from a constituency reserved for Schedu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in CPC Counter-Claim Procedure — Plaintiff Must File Written Statement to Counter-Claim Within 30 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Applies to Plaintiff's Written Statement to Counter-Claim Under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC, and Non-Compliance Can Lead to Striking Off Defence.

14 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Shriram EPC Ltd., was the original plaintiff in a suit for specific performance and alternative money decree. The respondent, Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.

2 May 2012

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Non-Compliance with Section 37 Conditions. The court held that mere disclosure by co-accused without independent evidence does not constitute prima facie case under Section 8(c) read with Rules 22 and 29 of NDPS Act.

7 Feb 2019

The applicant, Siraj Shaikh Nasir Munshi, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with C.R. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Encroachment Suit — Remand Order Set Aside for Exceeding Appellate Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC. The First Appellate Court's order reversing trial court's dismissal and remanding for fresh trial was held to be without jurisdiction as the suit was not disposed of on a preliminary point.

20 Dec 2019

The case arises from a suit for removal of encroachment and possession filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Daily Wager Not Entitled to Reinstatement for Failure to Complete 240 Days Service. The court held that the workman did not complete 240 days of continuous service in the 12 months preceding retrenchment, and thus the Labour Court's award of reinstatement with backwages was perverse and unsustainable.

7 Oct 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged the award of the First Labour Court, Pune, in Reference (IDA) No.36 of 1990, which directed reinst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Revaluation of Lease Premium and Ground Rent for Commercial Plots. The court upheld CIDCO's power to revise lease terms based on current market rates under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, rejecting claims of estoppel and legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by commercial plot allottees in Navi Mumbai challenging the decision of the City and Industrial Devel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)