Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim for Son of Deceased Employee Despite Delayed Application. Court holds that delay in making representation does not extinguish right to compassionate appointment if the claim is otherwise valid under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1967.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Anita Bhujang Wagalgave and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider their representation dated 17-12-2019 and to include the name of Shri Nagraj Bhujang Wagalgave in the list of relatives of deceased/retired employees for appointment on compassionate ground. The petitioners are the family members of the deceased employee Bhujang Wagalgave, who was employed under the Zilla Parishad, Latur. The respondents included the State of Maharashtra, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Latur, and the Block Development Officer. The petitioners argued that despite the death of the employee, their representation for compassionate appointment was not considered. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the delay in making the representation should not be a ground to reject the claim outright. The court directed the respondents to consider the representation and decide it within a reasonable time, as the right to compassionate appointment is not extinguished by delay alone. The judgment was delivered by a division bench comprising Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge and Justice S. G. Dige on 12th April 2022.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Delay in Representation - Right to Consideration - Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1967 - The petitioners sought mandamus to consider their representation for compassionate appointment for Nagraj, son of deceased employee Bhujang Wagalgave. The court held that delay in making representation does not extinguish the right to compassionate appointment if the claim is otherwise valid. The court directed the respondents to consider the representation and decide it within a reasonable time. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 17-12-2019 and include the name of Nagraj Bhujang Wagalgave in the list of relatives of deceased/retired employees for appointment on compassionate ground.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to consider the representation dated 17-12-2019 and decide it within a reasonable time.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • Delay in representation
  • Right to consideration
  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service (Recruitment) Rules
  • 1967
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (04) 21

903 WRIT PETITION NO. 2089 OF 2021

2022-04-12

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, S. G. DIGE

Mr. A.D. Sonkawade for petitioners, Ms. R.P. Gaur, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. S.S. Manale for respondent Nos. 3 and 4

Smt. Anita Bhujang Wagalgave, Shri Nagraj Bhujang Wagalgave, Smt. Manisha Bhujang Wagalgave, Smt. Sapana Bhujang Wagalgave

The State of Maharashtra, The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Taluka Chakur, District Latur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for consideration of representation for compassionate appointment.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to consider representation dated 17-12-2019 and include name of Nagraj Bhujang Wagalgave in list of relatives for compassionate appointment.

Filing Reason

Non-consideration of representation for compassionate appointment after death of employee Bhujang Wagalgave.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a direction to consider their representation for compassionate appointment despite delay.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that their representation dated 17-12-2019 for compassionate appointment of Nagraj was not considered. Respondents likely opposed on grounds of delay or other reasons (not specified in text).

Ratio Decidendi

Delay in making representation for compassionate appointment does not extinguish the right to consideration; the authority must consider the representation on its merits.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, by the consent of the parties. The petitioners have put-forth prayer clauses 'B', 'C', 'D' and 'E' as under: ...

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 2089 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad. The court issued rule and heard the matter finally with consent of parties on 12th April 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1967:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim for Son of Deceased Employee Despite Delayed Application. Court holds that delay in making representation does not extinguish right to compassionate appointment if the claim is otherwise valid ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Violation of Policy Condition by Driving Without License. Insurer Not Liable to Indemnify Owner for Third-Party Claim When Owner Drove Vehicle Without Valid Driving License, ...