Search Results for "cause title amendment"

1753 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1753 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal: Stranger to Compromise Decree Can Challenge It by Separate Suit — Order 23 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Bar Such Suit

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the appellant, Triloki Nath Singh, seeking a declaration that a compromise decree dated 15 September 1994 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar under Bombay Moneylenders Act to Nullify Registered Sale Deeds. Multiple writ petitions challenge orders directing reconveyance of agricultural land alleged to be security for unlicensed money lending.

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 21 writ petitions collectively, all challenging orders passed by the Taluka Assistant Registr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals in Partition Suit — Defendants Challenge Partly-Decreed Judgment Under Section 96 CPC; Appeals Clubbed and Heard Together. The Division Bench Considers Whether Trial Court Rightly Granted Plaintiff Partial Relief in Suit for Partition, Declaration, and Injunction.

The judgment dealt with three Regular First Appeals preferred against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019 in O.S.No.90/2014 by the II Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Against Order Rejecting Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance. Appellants Sought to Be Added as Co-Plaintiffs, Citing Interest in Property and Necessity for Complete Adjudication.

This appeal arose from the order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting Chamber Summons No.1334/2004, by which the appellants so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amendment Order in Partition Suit for Lack of Due Diligence — Amendment Sought After Trial Concluded and Final Arguments Commenced, Allowing Addition of 12 Properties and 19 Defendants, Held to Be an Abuse of Process Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The petitioner, Dashrath Shiva Korlekar, legal heir of original Defendant No. 1 (Defendant No. 1C), challenged the order dated 22.02.2024 passed by th...