Search Results for "agency termination"

608 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 608 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Sealed Cover Promotion Case — Prosecution for Criminal Charge Must Be Pending Before Court to Invoke Sealed Cover Procedure. OM dated 14.09.1992 Clause (iii) Requires Actual Pendency of Criminal Prosecution, Not Mere Investigation or Sanction.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which upheld the order of the Central Administrative Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Under Section 482 CrPC. Compromise Between Parties Leads to Termination of Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The applicant, Jayshri W/o Ratan Uchit @ Jayshri W/o Subhash Bagul, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Import of Peas Under Restricted Category Based on Pre-Notification Contracts. Petitioners' goods cleared as contracts entered prior to amendment notification dated 29.03.2019 under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

The petitioners, M/s. Harihar Collections and M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP, are engaged in the import and export of agricultural commodities. They imported...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...