Search Results for "Extraordinary Writ Jurisdiction"

1888 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1888 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Land Record Correction Appeal. Delay of 30 Years Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Filing of Appeal Within Limitation Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Hari G. Koli, challenged an order dated August 21, 2019 passed by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Solapur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Land Grant Fraud Case. Petitioners Argue Complaint Lacks Specific Allegations and Trial Court Erred in Ordering Investigation.

Three criminal petitions were filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by accused Nos. 2 to 4 in PCR No.30/2012 seeking to quas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Writ Petition Lies Against National Stock Exchange for Termination. Maintainability Questioned on Grounds That NSE is Not State Under Article 12 and Dispute is Contractual.

The petitioner, Suprabhat Lala, was appointed as a Manager with the National Stock Exchange (NSE) on 1 October 2001 under terms and conditions set out...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...