Search Results for "service career"

481 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Recovery of Half Salary Paid During Study Leave. Study Leave Regulations for Government Servants Only Provide for Half Pay Leave, Not Full Pay.

This batch of petitions was filed by Assistant Professors and Lecturers working in Government Engineering Colleges in Gujarat. The petitioners were re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows ICAR Appeal in Service Benefit Dispute — Scientists and Technical Staff Not Similarly Situated for Advance Increments on Acquiring Ph.D. Article 14 Does Not Mandate Equal Treatment Across Distinct Cadres Governed by Different Rules.

The case involves a dispute between the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and its technical staff (respondents) regarding entitlement to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules Against CAS Benefits for Re-designated Lecturers at Rajasthan Agricultural University. Court affirms distinct cadres of Research Assistants and Lecturers, denies Career Advancement Scheme benefits but halts recovery of disbursed amounts

The judgment pertains to a legal dispute involving the Rajasthan Agricultural University and several respondents, primarily focusing on the implementa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Armed Forces Tribunal's Interference with Censure Punishment. The Court Held That the Tribunal Cannot Substitute Its Own Discretion for That of the Competent Authority in Awarding Censure Merely Because Different Forms of Censure Exist.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge Due to Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Adverse CR Entries Without Communication Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, challenged an order dated 26 February 2010 passed by the Principal Secretary and Legal Advisor, Law and Justice De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Probationary Police Sub-Inspectors Challenging Termination. Termination simpliciter of probationers for unsatisfactory performance without stigma does not require inquiry or hearing.

The petitioners, 20 individuals, were appointed as Police Sub-Inspectors on probation in the Maharashtra Police Force. During their probation period, ...