Search Results for "procedure after merger"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "procedure after merger"

316 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Directing Registration of BIFR Orders Under Registration Act, 1908 for Property Transfer by Operation of Law. BIFR orders sanctioning a scheme of revival-cum-demerger under SICA Act are documents affecting immovable property and require registration under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908; refusal to register on ground of non-exemption is not justified.

6 May 2026

The Petitioner, Swayam Realtors & Traders LLP, originally a company under the Companies Act, 1956 and later converted into an LLP under the Limited Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of MEIS Benefits on Ground of Mis-declaration of Intent. Court holds that mere mis-declaration of intent without specific provision in Foreign Trade Policy cannot be a ground to deny export incentives under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme.

2 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Portescap India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition to Proceed Despite Pending Arbitration — Arbitration Does Not Bar Winding Up Proceedings Under Section 439 of Companies Act, 1956. The Court held that winding up proceedings are independent of arbitration and the Company Court must consider the petition on its merits without postponement due to arbitration.

29 Jan 2016

The appellant, M/s. Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, M/s....

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

20 Jan 2025

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Capital Controls India Private Limited and Chloro Controls (India) Private Limited — Disputed Debt and Lack of Bona Fide Defence. Petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 dismissed as the debt was bona fide disputed and the company had a valid defence.

18 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. (formerly Capital Controls Company, Inc.), filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.

22 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

17 Jan 2012

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

28 Nov 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Based on Ex-Parte US Default Judgment — Foreign Decree Not a Debt Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 Without Satisfying Conditions for Enforcement in India.

5 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Marine Geotechnics LLC, an American company, obtained an ex-parte default judgment against the respondent, Coastal Marine Construction...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)