Search Results for "lawyer withdrawal"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Removal of Advocate from Legal Aid Panel for Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Removal Set Aside as Petitioner Was Not Given Opportunity of Hearing Before Being Removed from B-Panel of District Legal Services Authority.

The petitioner, Rajkumar, an advocate enrolled in the B-Panel of the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Coimbatore, was allotted a Motor Accide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Membership Dispute with Bangalore Turf Club Limited. Appellant Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Membership Under Club Rules and Order 39 CPC.

The appellant, Suraj Narredu, filed a suit (O.S.No.3797/2021) before the LXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a declarati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Bar Council Resolution Prohibiting Full-Time Salaried Law Officers from Practicing as Advocates. The Court Held That the Deletion of Exception Under Rule 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961 Is Valid and Applies to Municipal Law Officers.

The case involves a challenge by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Principal Law Officer against resolutions of the Bar Council of I...