Search Results for "industrial peace"

249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Daily Wager Challenging Industrial Court's Order on Res Judicata Grounds. Petitioner's claim for permanency and equal pay barred by earlier complaint dismissed for default, but High Court upholds dismissal on ground of abuse of process.

The petitioner, Rajendra Tribhuvandas Navare, a retired daily wager employed with Solapur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Reference of Industrial Dispute as Stale After 14-Year Delay. Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Vitiated Due to Inordinate Delay Without Justification.

The petitioner, M/s Bata India Limited, challenged an order of reference dated 31.03.2015 made by the State Government under Section 10 of the Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Deferral of Prosecution Authorisation Under Section 34 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Government Can Defer Consideration of Prosecution Authorisation Pending Adjudication of Underlying Industrial Dispute Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioner, M/S International Trimmings and Labels India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.

The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Clarified. Labour Court's Order Rejecting Approval for Dismissal Restored as It Did Not Exceed Its Limited Jurisdiction.

The appeal arose from a dispute between John D'Souza, a workman, and the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The workman joined as a b...