Search Results for "implied renewal"

152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute — Conveyance Deed Not Exempt Under Article 5(e) of Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) by CIDCO to Developer Held Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance, Not as Instrument of Lease or License.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and other stamp authorities against a common judgment of a learned Sing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Levy of Supervision Costs Under Bombay Prohibition Act. Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Costs from Liquor Licensee Quashed as Without Statutory Authority Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The petitioner, M/s. Vidarbha Liquor Corporation, a partnership firm holding a liquor license, challenged the retrospective levy and recovery of super...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...