High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and others, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners challenged demand notices for penalty issued under Rule 14(2) of the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, pertaining to short-lifting of liquor from the Karnataka State Beverages Corporation Limited (KSBCL). Rule 14(2) was inserted on 01/04/2003 and omitted on 01/08/2014, and the impugned demands related to the period when the rule was in force. Some petitions also sought writs of mandamus for renewal of their CL-9 licences for the excise year 2017-18. The court noted that the controversy was already covered by an earlier order in W.P.No.10335/2017 (Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Vs. The State of Karnataka and others) decided on 27/06/2017, but permitted counsels to raise additional grounds. After hearing arguments, the matters were reserved for orders on 25/07/2017 and judgment was pronounced on 18/08/2017. The available text, however, does not contain the final operative part of the judgment and the holding remains undisclosed.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the penalty imposed under Rule 14(2) of the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 for short-lifting of liquor is valid and enforceable?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (08) 19

W.P.No.27575/2017 c/w W.P.No.28172/2017, W.P.No.27988/2017, W.P.No.29609/2017, W.P.No.31513/2017, W.P.No.31515/2017, W.P.No.31517/2017, W.P.No.31518/2017, W.P.No.25895/2017 and W.P.No.26805/2017

2017-08-18

Dr. Justice Vineet Kothari

Mr. K.P. Kumar, Senior Counsel for Mr. G.K. Bhat, Advocate, Mr. Ismail Muneeb Musba, Advocate, Mr. K.N. Putte Gowda, Advocate, Mr. A.M. Suresh Reddy, AGA

M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Omkar Enterprises, Y.R. Manohar, Speciality Restaurants Pvt. Ltd, Main Land China, C.K. Dasappa, Specialty Restaurants Pvt. Ltd., Sea Route Bar & Restaurant, Sri. T.N. Krishnamurthy

The Excise Commissioner in Karnataka, The Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District, The Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Bangalore Urban District, The State of Karnataka by its Principal Secretary Finance Department, Inspector of Excise, Subramanyanagara Range, The Commissioner of Excise Government of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to penalty imposed on liquor licence holders for short-lifting of liquor under the Karnataka Excise Rules, 1968.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (CL-9 licence holders) sought quashing of demand notices for penalty and/or direction to renew their licences for the excise year 2017-18.

Filing Reason

The Excise Department issued demand notices imposing penalty under Rule 14(2) of the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 for short-lifting of liquor from the Karnataka State Beverages Corporation Limited (KSBCL) during the period when the rule was in force (from 01/04/2003 to 01/08/2014). Some petitioners also faced non-renewal of CL-9 licences.

Previous Decisions

The issue was covered by an earlier order in W.P.No.10335/2017 (Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Vs. The State of Karnataka and others) decided on 27/06/2017, but counsels urged additional grounds.

Issues

Whether penalty under Rule 14(2) of the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 for short-lifting of liquor is lawful and can be demanded after the rule's omission?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners raised additional grounds challenging the penalty beyond those considered in the earlier writ petition.

Judgment Excerpts

Though the controversy involved in the present batch of petitions regarding levy of Penalty under Rule 14 (2) of the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 ... is covered by an order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.10335/2017 (Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Vs. The State of Karnataka and others), decided on 27/06/2017... The controversy in brief is regarding the imposition of Penalty for the short-lifting of the liquor during the period in question as against the quantity prescribed under the Rule 14(2) of the Excise Rules of 1968 from the sole Distributor of Liquor in the State, viz. Karnataka State Beverages Corporation Limited (KSBCL).

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging penalty demands and non-renewal of excise licences were listed together. Matters reserved for orders on 25/07/2017 and judgment pronounced on 18/08/2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968: Rule 14(2)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence. Reference Court's reliance on unsubstantiated sale instances and potential value of land without proper proof held erroneou...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.