Search Results for "dilapidated building"

177 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Cooperative Society — Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Authorization for Construction on Society Property.

The petitioners, residents and shop owners of Bandra Ashoka Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of cert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition Without Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act. Municipal Corporation Directed to Restore Possession and Follow Due Process Before Demolition of Alleged Unauthorised Structures.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Suman Devidas Somani and Ambika Kutty against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Tenants Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building. Court upholds eviction and demolition orders based on structural safety reports and compliance with statutory procedures under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 and Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976.

The petitioners, residents of Building No. 12 in Mathuradas Colony, Kalina, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute Between Society, Developer, and Occupants. Court Directs Handover of Possession Subject to Payment of Compensation Under Development Agreement.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as Receiver of two flats occupied by the appellants and direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal Seeking Injunction Against Demolition — Tenant Refusing to Vacate Despite Offer of Market Compensation. Court Held That Tenant Cannot Hold Development to Ransom and Must Accept Compensation or Face Eviction.

The appellant, Smt. Esther Manickam, was a tenant in Flat No.A2, Ground floor, Ruia Building, Juhu, Mumbai, paying rent less than Rs.50 per month. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Injunction Granted Against Alienation of Property. Development Agreement for Cessed Building Confers Prima Facie Rights; Balance of Convenience Favors Developer.

The appeal arises from an order of a learned Single Judge declining relief in a Notice of Motion taken out by the appellants in a suit for specific pe...