Madras High Court Allows Impleading of Legal Representatives of Deceased Tenant in Eviction Proceedings Under Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 — Rent Court's Dismissal of Impleading Petition Set Aside. The Court held that the definition of 'tenant' under Section 2(7) of the Act includes legal representatives and that the Rent Court's premature finding on the tenancy merits was erroneous.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 63
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from an eviction petition filed by the landlords (respondents) against the tenant, Anbalagan, before the Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram (Rent Court) under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017. The landlords sought eviction on grounds of default in payment of rent from March 2019 to September 2019 and the requirement of the premises for demolition and reconstruction. During the pendency of the eviction petition, the tenant Anbalagan died. His legal representatives, his wife A. Jayamalathi and minor daughter A. Anushiya, filed I.A. No.17 of 2022 seeking to be impleaded in the proceedings. The Rent Court dismissed the impleading petition on February 1, 2023, holding that the tenancy had not been proved and that the tenant had no right to continue after his death. Aggrieved, the legal representatives filed a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court. The High Court examined the definition of 'tenant' under Section 2(7) of the Act, which includes legal representatives. The Court observed that the Rent Court's finding on the merits of the tenancy at the impleading stage was premature and that the Rent Court had not considered the provisions of Order 22 Rule 4 CPC regarding abatement of proceedings. The High Court set aside the order of the Rent Court and allowed the impleading petition, directing the Rent Court to implead the petitioners as legal representatives of the deceased tenant and to proceed with the main eviction petition in accordance with law. The Court emphasized that the legal representatives are entitled to be heard on the merits of the eviction grounds.

Headnote

A) Rent Control - Impleading of Legal Representatives - Section 2(7) Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 - The Rent Court dismissed the impleading petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased tenant on the ground that the tenancy had not been proved and that the tenant had no right to continue after death. The High Court held that the definition of 'tenant' under Section 2(7) includes legal representatives, and that the Rent Court's finding on the merits of the tenancy at the impleading stage was premature. The Court set aside the order and allowed the impleading petition, directing the Rent Court to proceed with the main eviction petition. (Paras 4-8)

B) Civil Procedure - Abatement of Proceedings - Order 22 Rule 4 CPC - The High Court noted that the Rent Court had not considered the provisions of Order 22 Rule 4 CPC regarding abatement of proceedings upon death of a party. The Court held that the Rent Court ought to have allowed the impleading petition to prevent abatement and to enable the legal representatives to defend the eviction proceedings. (Para 6)

C) Rent Control - Eviction on Ground of Demolition and Reconstruction - The landlord sought eviction on grounds of default in rent and requirement of the premises for demolition and reconstruction. The tenant's legal representatives sought impleadment to contest the eviction. The High Court held that the Rent Court's dismissal of the impleading petition was erroneous as it precluded the legal representatives from being heard on the merits of the eviction grounds. (Paras 2-3, 7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the legal representatives of a deceased tenant are entitled to be impleaded in pending eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, and whether the Rent Court erred in dismissing the impleading petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the civil revision petition, set aside the order dated February 1, 2023 passed by the Rent Court in I.A. No.17 of 2022 in R.L.T.O.P. No.1 of 2021, and allowed the impleading petition. The Rent Court was directed to implead the petitioners as legal representatives of the deceased tenant and to proceed with the main eviction petition in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Impleading of legal representatives
  • Abatement of proceedings
  • Right to continue tenancy
  • Section 2(7) Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act
  • 2017
  • Order 22 Rule 4 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (03) 185

C.R.P. No.1507 of 2023 and C.M.P. No.9951 of 2023

2026-03-27

R. Sakthivel

2026:MHC:1269

Mr. R. Krishna Prabhu for petitioners, Mr. Suriya Badrinath for Ms. V. Srimathi for respondents

A. Jayamalathi and A. Anushiya (legal representatives of deceased tenant R. Anbalagan)

Somaraj Dheekshidar and Sarasa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision petition against dismissal of impleading petition in eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners (legal representatives of deceased tenant) sought to set aside the order dated February 1, 2023 passed by the Rent Court dismissing their impleading petition, and to allow the impleading petition so that they could be heard in the eviction proceedings.

Filing Reason

The Rent Court dismissed the impleading petition on the ground that the tenancy had not been proved and that the tenant had no right to continue after his death.

Previous Decisions

The Rent Court (Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram) dismissed I.A. No.17 of 2022 in R.L.T.O.P. No.1 of 2021 on February 1, 2023.

Issues

Whether the legal representatives of a deceased tenant are entitled to be impleaded in pending eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017. Whether the Rent Court erred in dismissing the impleading petition on the ground that the tenancy had not been proved and that the tenant had no right to continue after his death.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that they are the legal representatives of the deceased tenant and are entitled to be impleaded under Section 2(7) of the Act, which defines 'tenant' to include legal representatives. The respondents opposed the impleading petition, contending that the tenancy had not been proved and that the tenant had no right to continue after his death.

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of 'tenant' under Section 2(7) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 includes legal representatives of a deceased tenant. The Rent Court's dismissal of the impleading petition on the ground that the tenancy had not been proved was premature and erroneous. The legal representatives are entitled to be impleaded to prevent abatement of proceedings and to enable them to defend the eviction petition on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The definition of 'tenant' under Section 2(7) of the Act includes legal representatives. The Rent Court's finding on the merits of the tenancy at the impleading stage is premature. The Rent Court ought to have allowed the impleading petition to prevent abatement and to enable the legal representatives to defend the eviction proceedings.

Procedural History

The landlords filed R.L.T.O.P. No.1 of 2021 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram seeking eviction of the tenant Anbalagan. During pendency, the tenant died. His legal representatives filed I.A. No.17 of 2022 for impleadment. The Rent Court dismissed the impleading petition on February 1, 2023. Aggrieved, the legal representatives filed C.R.P. No.1507 of 2023 before the Madras High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The High Court allowed the revision petition on March 27, 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017: Section 2(7)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 22 Rule 4
  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Panshet Dam Rehabilitation — Land Acquisition Act Prevails Over Resettlement Act in Absence of Section 11(1) Declaration. The court held that the Full Bench decision in Ganpat Balwant Pa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit for Non-Payment of Rent and Subletting — Tenant Failed to Establish Bona Fide Denial of Title. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the tenant's denial of landlord's title was no...