Search Results for "debate before voting"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 Advocates Act, 1961 — Permanent Committee System Upheld. Court dismisses challenge to objective criteria and permanent committee system for designation of Senior Advocates, rejecting plea for fresh designations.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by Ms. Indira Jaising, a Senior Advocate, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in 2015, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Appeals Filed by Upa-Lokayukta Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Communication Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 – Single Judge Held Petition Not Maintainable

The appellant, Justice Subhash B. Adi, is the incumbent Upa-Lokayukta of Karnataka, appointed in 2013 under the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984. On 27 N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...