Search Results for "coverage clause"

415 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case, Modifies Award to Exempt Insurer from Interest Liability Under Policy Exclusion

Appellant appealed against a Judgment and Award that granted compensation of Rs.6,92,760/- with 12% interest to the claimants, the wife and son of dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030020522019_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Challenge to Exemption Notifications Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act. Comparison of Benefits Must Be Holistic, Not Item-by-Item, to Determine if Exemption Is Justified.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi, a registered trade union representing private security guards, filed a writ petition challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging ESIC Admission Classification Based on Insurable Service Duration. Classification of insured persons into Groups I, II, III based on 5/4/3 years of service held not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Samiksha Dhole and Rasika Pohare, filed writ petitions challenging the admission notice dated 28.6.2017 issued by the Employees' Stat...