High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case, Modifies Award to Exempt Insurer from Interest Liability Under Policy Exclusion

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

Appellant appealed against a Judgment and Award that granted compensation of Rs.6,92,760/- with 12% interest to the claimants, the wife and son of deceased Dharman, who died in an accident while employed as a driver. The Insurance Company did not challenge the compensation quantum but contested its liability for interest, citing an exclusion clause in the workmen's compensation policy. The High Court analyzed the policy terms and precedents, concluding that the Insurance Company was not liable for interest under the contract. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award to hold the employer solely liable for interest while the Insurance Company's liability was limited to the principal compensation amount.

Headnote

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard an appeal filed under Section 30(1) of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (E.C. Act) against a Judgment and Award dated 19.03.2018 in ECA No.20/2017 -- The appeal challenged the imposition of joint liability on the appellant Insurance Company to pay interest on the compensation awarded -- The Court examined the insurance policy clauses and held that the policy excluded liability for interest, making the employer solely responsible -- The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the award to exempt the Insurance Company from interest liability while upholding the compensation amount -- The decision relied on Supreme Court and Division Bench precedents interpreting similar policy exclusions

Issue of Consideration: Whether the Court below is justified in fixing the liability to pay interest on the compensation awarded on the appellant Insurance Company?

Final Decision

The appeal was partly allowed. The High Court modified the Impugned Award to hold that the appellant Insurance Company is not liable to pay interest on the compensation awarded. The liability for interest was imposed solely on the employer/respondent No.3, while the Insurance Company's liability was limited to the principal compensation amount of Rs.6,92,760/-.

2026 LawText (KAR) (02) 37

Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 6064 of 2018 (WC)

2026-02-06

Tara Vitasta Ganju

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7097

Ravishankar C R., A.M.Surya Prakash

The New India Assurance Co Ltd.

Smt. Shanthidharaman, Sri Karthik D, M/s Universal Trading Company

Nature of Litigation: Appeal against a Judgment and Award in a workmen's compensation case

Remedy Sought

The appellant Insurance Company sought modification of the award to exempt it from liability for interest on the compensation

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed under Section 30(1) of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the imposition of joint liability for interest

Previous Decisions

The learned Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.6,92,760/- with 12% interest from the date of accident, holding the respondents jointly and severally liable

Issues

Whether the deceased was an employee under the respondent No.2 Whether the accident arose out of and in the course of employment Whether the claimants are entitled to compensation and its quantum Whether the Insurance Company is liable for interest on the compensation awarded

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's counsel argued that the insurance policy excluded liability for interest, making the employer solely responsible Reliance was placed on Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments interpreting similar policy exclusions The counsel submitted that the challenge was only on the interest aspect, not the compensation quantum

Ratio Decidendi

The Insurance Company is not liable for interest on compensation under a workmen's compensation policy if the policy contains an exclusion clause for interest and penalty -- Such policies are private contracts distinct from compulsory motor vehicle insurance -- The terms of the insurance policy govern the liabilities, and exclusions must be given effect to as per contract law principles

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company submits that he is not challenging the quantum of the compensation awarded and his challenge is only on one aspect The substantial question of law that arises in the present case is: 'Whether the Court below is justified in fixing the liability to pay interest on the compensation awarded on the appellant Insurance Company?' The Policy also provides for an exclusion of the interest and penalty on any such claims

Procedural History

The claimants filed a petition under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 -- The learned Tribunal passed a Judgment and Award on 19.03.2018, awarding compensation with interest -- The Insurance Company filed an appeal under Section 30(1) of the Act -- The High Court heard the appeal, with respondents proceeded ex-parte due to non-appearance -- The Court delivered the judgment on 06.02.2026, partly allowing the appeal

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case, Modifies Award to Exempt Insurer from Interest Liability Under Policy Exclusion
Related Judgement
High Court Acquittal in POCSO Case: Court Cites Doubts in Evidence and Delayed FIR. Bombay High Court’s Nagpur Bench quashes 20-year conviction, citing inconsistencies, delayed report, and lack of corroborative evidence.