KAHC010068412019_1
16 Aug 2019...
Search Results for "best before date"
5026 result(s) found
Found 5026 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.
2 Dec 2021The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eligibility Condition for Settlement Commission Applications Under Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that a press release and notification imposing a cut-off date for eligibility to file settlement applications were ultra vires the Act.
2 Apr 2024The petitioner, a company engaged in sugar and ethanol business, was subjected to a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 25.07.2019...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Part, Holds Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993 Applicable to Contracts Entered Before Its Commencement for Delays Occurring After 23.09.1992. The Court ruled that the Act is retroactive and applies to all payments made after its commencement, and that a suit for interest alone is maintainable.
23 Jan 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a common judgment of the Gauhati High Court which had set aside trial court decrees in favor of supp...
- 340
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Filing of Revised Income Tax Returns After Due Date in Amalgamation Case — Holds That NCLT-Approved Scheme Overrides Procedural Timelines Under Income Tax Act. Clause 64(c) of the Scheme Permitting Revised Returns Has Statutory Force and Department Cannot Reject Them as Invalid.
18 Dec 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Dalmia Power Limited and M/s Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited against the judgment of the Division Be...
- 157
High Court
High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
27 Mar 2026The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...
- 310
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Maharashtra Tenancy Act Case — Right to Purchase Not Lost Due to Lack of Knowledge of Landlord's Death. The court held that the limitation period under Section 32-F of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 runs from the date the tenant gains knowledge of the cessation of the landlord's disability, not from the date of cessation itself.
18 Sep 2019The case involves a dispute under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, concerning the right of tenants to purchase agricultural l...
- 502
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Matters to Final Hearing on Whether Pre-execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Orders Can Be on Grounds Beyond Alka Subhash Gadia Exceptions. The Court Examined if New Grounds Such as Absence of Live Link and Delay Could Be Used to Challenge Detention Orders Before Execution.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of matters challenging detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smugg...
- 76
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.
22 Mar 2021The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...
- 334
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Assistant Professor Selection on Ground of NET/SET Exemption — Ph.D. Acquired After Last Date Does Not Disqualify Candidate Under UGC Regulations. The court held that the UGC Regulations exempt Ph.D. holders from NET/SET, and the date of acquisition of Ph.D. is not material as long as the candidate possesses it at the time of selection.
25 Jul 2012The petitioner, Dayaram Dagdoba Maske, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the selection of respondent n...
- 116
