Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eligibility Condition for Settlement Commission Applications Under Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that a press release and notification imposing a cut-off date for eligibility to file settlement applications were ultra vires the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a company engaged in sugar and ethanol business, was subjected to a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 25.07.2019. Subsequently, a notice under Section 153A was issued. The petitioner sought to file a settlement application before the Settlement Commission. However, a Press Release dated 07.09.2021 and a Notification dated 28.09.2021 restricted eligibility to file such applications to those assessees who were eligible as on 31.01.2021. The petitioner challenged these conditions as ultra vires the Act. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 245C and found that the Act did not impose any such cut-off date for eligibility. The court held that the conditions imposed by the press release and notification were beyond the scope of the Act and could not be sustained. The petition was allowed, and the impugned conditions were quashed.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Settlement Commission - Eligibility - Section 245C of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The court considered whether a press release and notification could impose an additional eligibility condition for filing settlement applications, restricting it to those eligible as on 31.01.2021, when the Act itself did not contain such a restriction. Held that the condition was ultra vires the Act and could not be sustained. (Paras 1-35)

B) Income Tax - Interim Board for Settlement - Powers - Section 245B of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The court examined the scope of the Interim Board's powers and held that it could not impose conditions beyond those specified in the Act. (Paras 20-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the condition imposed by Press Release dated 07.09.2021 and Notification dated 28.09.2021, restricting eligibility to file application before the Settlement Commission/Interim Board to those assessees who were eligible as on 31.01.2021, is ultra vires the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned condition in the Press Release dated 07.09.2021 and Notification dated 28.09.2021 to the extent they restricted eligibility to file settlement applications to those assessees eligible as on 31.01.2021.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 245C of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Eligibility for filing settlement application
  • Validity of press release and notification imposing additional condition
  • Retrospective effect of procedural amendments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 151

Writ Petition No.5862 of 2021

2024-04-02

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

2024:BHC-AS:15659-DB

Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Madhur Agrawal and Mr. Atit Soni i/b. Mr. P.B. Gujar for petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondents.

Sar Senapati Santaji Ghorpade Sugar Factory Ltd.

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Interim Board (Settlement Commission), Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the validity of a press release and notification imposing an additional eligibility condition for filing settlement applications under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the condition in Press Release dated 07.09.2021 and Notification dated 28.09.2021 restricting eligibility to file settlement applications to those assessees eligible as on 31.01.2021.

Filing Reason

The petitioner received a notice stating that a valid application for settlement had not been filed, and the press release and notification imposed an arbitrary cut-off date for eligibility.

Issues

Whether the condition in Press Release dated 07.09.2021 and Notification dated 28.09.2021 restricting eligibility to file settlement applications to those eligible as on 31.01.2021 is ultra vires the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the condition imposed by the press release and notification was beyond the scope of the Act and arbitrary. Respondents argued that the condition was valid and within the powers of the authorities.

Ratio Decidendi

The condition imposing a cut-off date for eligibility to file settlement applications is ultra vires the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Act does not contain any such restriction.

Judgment Excerpts

Since the pleadings are completed, by consent of the parties, we decided to dispose the petition at the admission stage itself. Petitioner is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading in sugar, ethanol, power, etc.

Procedural History

The petition was filed challenging a notice dated 16.09.2021 and a condition in Press Release dated 07.09.2021. Subsequently, the petition was amended to also challenge Notification dated 28.09.2021. The court disposed the petition at the admission stage with consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 132, Section 153A, Section 245B, Section 245C
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes SDO's Compensation Order in Transmission Line Dispute; Rules that Telegraph Authority Alone Has Jurisdiction Under Telegraph Act. Transmission Licensee Constituted as Telegraph Authority Under Section 164 of Electricity Act,...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Cancellation of Highest Bidder's Plot Allotment. Court Considers Whether Requiring Bidder to Match Higher Bid for Adjacent Plot Was Arbitrary and Violative of Tender Conditions.