Search Results for "Selection Committee jurisdiction"

677 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 677 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Provisional Selection List in University Appointment Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster — Backlog Posts Must Be Filled in Accordance with Karnataka Reservation of Appointments or Posts (Amendment) Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Shri Venu S. A., challenged a provisional selection list dated 12-07-2023 issued by the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Gram Panchayat Adhikari Recruitment Dispute — Waiting List Not Permissible Under 2015 Rules. Division Bench erred in directing consideration of candidates beyond the select list as 2015 Rules override 1978 Rules and do not provide for a waiting list.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court Division Bench. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Personal Assistants Seeking Parity in Pay Scale with Stenographers. Court holds that Personal Assistants and Stenographers perform identical duties and are entitled to equal pay under the principle of equal pay for equal work.

The petitioners, seven Personal Assistants working in the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition seeking parity in pay scale with Stenographers. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPSC Selection Process for Police Sub-Inspector Posts. Court upholds selection based on revised merit list prepared after re-evaluation of answer keys, finding no violation of rules or principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, who were candidates for the post of Police Sub-Inspector (Driver) in Maharashtra, challenged the selection process conducted by the M...