Search Results for "Security Services"

2183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Women Army Officers' Right to Permanent Commission in Landmark Gender Equality Judgment. Court holds that women SSC officers are entitled to PC at par with male counterparts, rejecting discriminatory service conditions.

The case concerns a batch of appeals filed by the Ministry of Defence against a Delhi High Court judgment directing the grant of Permanent Commission ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Contractual interpretation of service tax liability under security services contract upheld by arbitrator.

The petitioner, Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Fixed-Term Security Guard in Saudi Arabian Airlines Case. Fixed-term employment found to be a camouflage to deny permanency benefits under MRTU & PULP Act.

The appellant, Saudi Arabian Airlines, engaged the respondent workman as a Security Guard on a fixed-term contract from 1st October 1989 for two years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demand for 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Tender. Court holds that demand for 10% performance guarantee instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and unsustainable.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietory concern, participated in a tender issued by the Central Railway, Nagpur Division, for catering service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Contract. Court holds that Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 prescribing 3% performance guarantee is binding and demand for 10% is arbitrary.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietorship concern, responded to a tender notice dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Nagpur Division of Central Rai...