Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demand for 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Tender. Court holds that demand for 10% performance guarantee instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietory concern, participated in a tender issued by the Central Railway, Nagpur Division, for catering services at Nagpur Railway Station. The petitioner's bid was found eligible and a letter of allotment was issued on 15.05.2023, demanding a performance security deposit of 10% of the total contract value. The petitioner contended that this was a departure from the Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020, which stipulated a performance guarantee of only 3%. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the demand. The court examined the circular and found that it was binding on the respondents. The respondents failed to provide any justification for the higher demand. The court held that the demand for 10% was arbitrary and unsustainable, and directed the respondents to accept a performance guarantee of 3% as per the circular. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Tender - Performance Security Deposit - Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 - The petitioner challenged the demand for 10% performance security deposit instead of 3% as per the circular. The court held that the circular was binding and the demand for 10% was arbitrary and unsustainable. (Paras 2-10)

B) Contract Law - Tender - Discrimination - The court found that the respondents had not justified the departure from the circular and that the demand for 10% was discriminatory. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the demand for performance security deposit at 10% of the contract value instead of 3% as per the Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and unsustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to accept performance guarantee to the extent of 3% of the contract value as per the Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Administrative Law
  • Contract Law
  • Tender Law
  • Performance Security Deposit
  • Railway Board Circular
  • Arbitrariness
  • Discrimination
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 195

Writ Petition No. 4735 of 2023

2023-10-19

Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, C.J., A.S. Chandurkar, J.

2023:BHC-NAG:15440-DB

Shri Akshat Bajpai, Ms. Aastha Sharma for petitioner; Shri Anup J. Gilda for respondents

M/s. Shiv & Sons

Union of India, Central Railway, Central Railway Commercial Branch Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging demand for 10% performance security deposit in a railway catering tender.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the demand for 10% performance security deposit and direction to accept 3% as per Railway Board Circular.

Filing Reason

The respondent demanded 10% performance security deposit instead of 3% as per the Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020.

Issues

Whether the demand for 10% performance security deposit instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular is arbitrary and unsustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the demand for 10% performance security deposit was a departure from the Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 which stipulated 3%. Respondents argued that the circular was not binding and the demand was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is binding on the respondents. The demand for 10% performance security deposit without justification is arbitrary and unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The demand for 10% performance security deposit instead of 3% as per the Railway Board Circular is arbitrary and unsustainable.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the demand for 10% performance security deposit. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 19.10.2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demand for 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Tender. Court holds that demand for 10% performance guarantee instead of 3% as per Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 is arbitrary and ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation ...