High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Section 19(10)"
243 result(s) found
Found 243 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Whether Official Assignee Can Adjudicate Claims Without a Pre-existing Decree Under Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. Legal Question Framed for Determination Concerning the Scope of the Official Assignee's Adjudicatory Powers Under Sections 6, 46, and 48 of the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.
2 Jul 2026The matter arose out of two insolvency petitions where a creditor lodged a claim with the official assignee. The official assignee took the position t...
- 65
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Demand Notice and Rebate Calculation. Dispute Concerns Application of 25% Tariff Rebate Under Indian Electricity Act, 1910 Pursuant to 1999 Judgment
8 Jul 2011The matter concerns a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a sick industrial unit engaged in steel manufacturing. The...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.
1 Sep 2020The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...
- 474
High Court
KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee’s Appeal Against Direct Electricity Supply by Board. Board’s Action Upheld as Comparison of Maximum Demand Under Section 19(1)(b)(ii) of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 Required Assessment of Actual Supply, Not Generating Capacity.
29 Jan 1969The appellant, Sihor Electricity Works Ltd., held a licence under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 for generation and distribution of electrical energ...
- 116
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Power Distribution Company in Electricity Dues Recovery Case — Auction Purchaser Liable for Previous Owner's Outstanding Electricity Dues Under Specific Auction Clauses. The Court held that where an auction notice explicitly mentions electricity dues and absolves the secured creditor of liability, the auction-purchaser must clear those dues before seeking a new connection.
14 Feb 2020The respondent, M/s. Srigdhaa Beverages, was the successful auction-purchaser of a mineral water bottling plant owned by M/s. SB Beverages Private Lim...
- 391
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Preliminary Objection to Writ Petition Maintainability Against Private Company Performing Public Duty. Holds That a Licensee Under Indian Electricity Act, 1910 Is Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution.
23 Aug 2005The petitioner, an individual residing on his property for 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus di...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.
10 Mar 2017The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
18 Jan 2011The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner,...
- 159
