Search Results for "Section 153A IPC"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Default Bail in UAP Act Case — Extension of Remand Lacked Specific Reasons Under Section 43D(2)(b). High Court's Grant of Statutory Bail Upheld as Special Court's Satisfaction Was Not Based on Valid Grounds for Further Detention.

The case arose from a murder and subsequent violence in Coimbatore in September 2016. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over investigation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Kerala Reviews Challenge to Preventive Detention Under Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. Detention Order Examined for Validity Where Detenu Not Convicted and Involvement Alleged Only Peripheral.

The writ petition (criminal) was filed before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Kerala A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Unlawful Activities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. Applicants Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC as Allegations of Waging War Against Government and Unlawful Activities Not Substantiated.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GULFISHA FATIMA

The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection to Journalist in Multiple FIR Case Based on News Broadcasts. Court Transfers One FIR for Investigation, Stays Other Proceedings, and Emphasizes Balance Between Freedom of Speech and Criminal Process Under Article 19(1)(a) and Article 32 of the Constitution.

The dispute arose from two news broadcasts by the petitioner, a journalist and editor-in-chief of Republic TV and R Bharat, on 16 April 2020 and 21 Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Remand Extension Order in UAPA Case for Lack of Jurisdiction — Magistrate Not Empowered to Extend Remand Beyond 15 Days Without Production of Accused. Default bail order set aside as premature.

The petitioners, five individuals arrested in Crime No.71/2022 registered by Panambur Police Station for offences under Sections 121, 121A, 120B, 153A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in WhatsApp Post Case Due to Lack of Intent and Poor Investigation. Forwarding an objectionable post without deliberate and malicious intention does not attract Sections 295-A, 153-A IPC and Section 3(v) of SC/ST Act.

The applicant, Dnyaneshwar Rohidas Wakale, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of crimina...