Search Results for "Section 147 proviso"

455 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 455 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.

The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Already Disclosed Loan Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Jainam Investments, a partnership firm engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deemed Owner Liability Under Section 163-A MV Act. Occupant of Jeep Treated as Third Party; Insurance Company Cannot Avoid Liability on Ground of Policy Exclusion.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 19.02.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reason to Believe — Amount Received on Retirement from Partnership Firm Held to be Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax.

The petitioners, Prashant S. Joshi and Dattaram Shridhar Bhosale, were partners in a real estate development partnership firm. They retired from the p...