Search Results for "Saraswat Bank"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Testamentary Suit No. 13 of 1994 — Will Not Proved Due to Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Due Execution Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiffs, Harish Vithal Kulkarni and Shivanand Vishwanath Warty, claiming to be executors under a Will dated 11th October, 1991 of Mahadeo Sabni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Payments Made by Company in Liquidation Void Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and Orders Refund. Payments made after winding up order to caterer without court approval are void, and the caterer must repay with interest.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. GOL Offshore Limited (in liquidation) filed OLR No. 139 of 2018 under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Passes Judgment in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Whether a Cheque Issued as Security Attracts Liability Under Section 138 Remains the Central Question.

The appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, Goa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Post-Foreign Award Relief in Commercial Arbitration Dispute - Vessel Sale Prior to Petition Filing Renders Relief Infructuous

The High Court dismissed a commercial arbitration petition seeking interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award, Reduces Future Interest from 18% to 9%. Court upheld the arbitrator's findings on quantum but modified the future interest rate as excessive under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), a Central Government Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 3 July 2006 passed by a so...