Search Results for "Real Estate Regulation and Development Act 2016"

245 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 245 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case — Force Majeure Clause Cannot Override Statutory Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act. Promoter Liable to Pay Interest for Delayed Possession Even if Delay Due to Events Beyond Control.

The case involves an appeal filed by Sanvo Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (the promoter/developer) under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Devel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to RERA Refund Order Alleged Void for Want of Jurisdiction. The Petition Tests Whether Supreme Court's Newtech Decision Renders Final Unappealed RERA Orders Non-Est Under Section 71 of RERA Act.

The writ petition came before the Bombay High Court raising the issue whether an order passed by the RERA Adjudicating Officer directing refund of Rs....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Case. Appellate Tribunal's Suo Motu Adjudication on Termination of Agreement Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves an appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act) filed by Satyam Developers, the prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developers' Challenge to PMC's Differential Development Charges Policy. Held that imposing higher development charges on properties within 100 meters of DP road while exempting others violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a group of developers and a real estate association, challenged the policy of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) that imposed highe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Auction Purchaser Not Liable to Pay Unearned Increase to DDA in Compulsory Acquisition Case. Conversion Charges Refunded as Property Conveyed Was Freehold, Not Leasehold.

The Supreme Court of India heard two cross-appeals arising from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 30.03.2016 in LPA No.226 of 2014. The dispute...