Search Results for "Quo Warranto"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Quo Warranto"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Mandamus Against MoRTH Official for Alleged Caste Fraud. Court holds that writ of mandamus cannot be issued against a private individual and that the petitioner has no locus standi to seek action against a government employee based on unsubstantiated allegations.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Karimishetty Sreenivasulu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, styled as a public interest litigatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MSME Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — Alternative Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Available. Petitioner's Challenge to Award Under Section 18 of MSMED Act Rejected as Court Finds No Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Appeal Remedy.

22 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Duro Shox Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, challenged an award dated 02.02.2024 passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ESI Order Passed Without Supplying Interim Reports to Employer — Violation of Natural Justice. Section 45A ESI Act assessment set aside as authority relied on Social Security Officer reports not shared with petitioner, remitted for fresh hearing.

18 Sep 2024

The petitioner, SBI General Insurance Company Limited, challenged an order dated 29 December 2023/1 January 2024 passed by the Assistant Director, Aut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

10 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order of Female Employee in Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. — Transfer Held Malicious and Without Authority of Law. Transfer order issued by Secretary without authority from Managing Committee under Articles of Association is void ab initio.

16 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Veena Harish, was employed as an Accounts Officer at the Bangalore Turf Club Ltd., a company incorporated under the erstwhile Com...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation to CBI in FIRs Alleging Offences by Petitioner's Son. Court holds that mere apprehension of bias is insufficient; credible material required for transfer of investigation to CBI under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

22 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Sinha, father of Kumar Ajitabh, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking trans...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GCZMA Demolition Order for Lack of Quorum and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's 18 rooms saved as sub-committee meeting with only 4 members violated requirement of 5 members for cases directed by High Court.

22 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Shri Sylvestre D'Souza, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/02...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Bill Based on Contract Demand Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Consumer Liable for Minimum Charges Even Without Actual Consumption. The court held that the consumer cannot unilaterally reduce contract demand and must pay minimum charges as per tariff, and Section 126 assessment for unauthorized use is not applicable when billing is based on contract demand.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Vinay Tilokchand Karnavat, a medical practitioner running a hospital in Sillod, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

23 Dec 2015

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-Detention Challenge to COFEPOSA Order Filed by Wife of Proposed Detenu. Court holds that a pre-detention petition is not maintainable as the detention order had not been served and the detenu was not in custody.

24 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Smt. Shanta Prakash Shewale, wife of Prakash Pandurang Shewale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a detention...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)