Search Results for "Osmanabad"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Petitioner’s Writ for CBI Probe Into Alleged Police Torture — Investigation Already Transferred to CID. Court Holds That Registration of FIR Against Lower Officials and CID Inquiry Adequate at This Stage; CBI Probe Not Warranted.

This criminal writ petition was filed by a resident of village Kangara, Osmanabad, challenging the alleged police high-handedness and seeking registra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Dismisses Criminal Appeal of Accused in Murder Case, Upholding Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction Based on Sole Eyewitness Testimony of Deceased’s Mother Upheld as Credible Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Recovery of Weapon.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Vikas @ Sadhu Gendev Hagare, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for murder under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals for Enhancement of Land Acquisition Compensation — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Guntha. Reference Court's award of Rs. 60,000 per Guntha set aside as inadequate; court considers sale instances and potential value under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The judgment pertains to three first appeals filed by Dhondiram Tambe, Manohar Tambe, and Dagdu Tambe against the State of Maharashtra and other respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and testimony lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Ganesh Baban Solankar, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2006 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti s/o Ganpati Sadekar, was a Junior Assistant in the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The complainant, Balaji...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. Shobha Sonba Raut, was serving as Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer at Osmanabad. The complainant, Dattatraya Ar...