Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in dismissing the reference for default without considering the merits, and remands the matter for fresh adjudication under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 60
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shivaji Pandurang Bansode, filed a first appeal against the judgment and award dated 25-02-2013 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga, dismissing his Land Acquisition Reference No. 67 of 2008 (Old LAR No. 267 of 2002). The appellant's land bearing Survey No. 41/3 admeasuring 00.44 R situated at village Kolsur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for construction of Kolsur Medium Project. The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published on 26-12-1996. The Special Land Acquisition Officer declared an award under Section 11 and granted compensation of Rs.15,400/-. Dissatisfied, the appellant filed a reference under Section 18 for enhancement. The Reference Court dismissed the reference without adjudicating on merits. The High Court admitted the appeal and heard it finally. The court found that the Reference Court erred in dismissing the reference for default. The High Court set aside the impugned judgment and award and remanded the matter to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication on merits, directing both parties to be given an opportunity to lead evidence. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation Enhancement - Dismissal of Reference - Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - The Reference Court dismissed the reference for default without considering the merits of the case. The High Court held that the dismissal was improper and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the Reference Court to decide the reference on merits after giving both parties an opportunity to lead evidence. (Paras 1-5)

B) Land Acquisition - Reference under Section 18 - Duty of Reference Court - The Reference Court must adjudicate the reference on its merits and not dismiss it for default. The High Court set aside the impugned judgment and award and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Reference Court was justified in dismissing the Land Acquisition Reference for default without adjudicating on merits, and whether the appellant-claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation for the acquired land.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and award dated 25-02-2013 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga in Land Acquisition Reference No. 67 of 2008 (Old LAR No. 267 of 2002) is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication on merits. The Reference Court shall give both parties an opportunity to lead evidence and decide the reference afresh in accordance with law. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition
  • Compensation Enhancement
  • Reference Court Dismissal
  • Remand for Fresh Adjudication
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (06) 15

First Appeal No. 902 of 2017

2018-06-18

K.K. SONAWANE, J.

Mr. A.B. Kale for appellant, Mr. B.V. Virdhe, AGP for respondents No. 1 and 2

Shivaji Pandurang Bansode

The State of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Osmanabad; The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Osmanabad, Krashna Khore; The Executive Engineer, Krushna Khore Development Valley, Omerga, Dist. Osmanbad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against dismissal of Land Acquisition Reference for enhancement of compensation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for his acquired land.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the compensation awarded by the SLAO and dismissal of the reference by the Reference Court.

Previous Decisions

The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.15,400/- as compensation under Section 11. The Reference Court dismissed the reference under Section 18.

Issues

Whether the Reference Court was justified in dismissing the reference for default without adjudicating on merits. Whether the appellant is entitled to enhanced compensation for the acquired land.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Reference Court erred in dismissing the reference without considering the merits. Respondents supported the impugned judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Reference Court must adjudicate a land acquisition reference on its merits and cannot dismiss it for default. The matter must be remanded for fresh consideration to ensure justice.

Judgment Excerpts

This first appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and award dated 25-02-2013, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga, dismissing the Land Acquisition Reference No. 67 of 2008 (Old LAR No. 267 of 2002). The land in question situated at Kolsur admeasuring 00-44 R was placed under acquisition pursuant to the notification under Section 4 of the Act of 1894 published on 26-12-1996 for construction of Kolsur Medium Project.

Procedural History

The Special Land Acquisition Officer declared an award under Section 11 and granted compensation of Rs.15,400/-. The appellant filed a reference under Section 18 for enhancement. The Reference Court dismissed the reference on 25-02-2013. The appellant filed the present first appeal on an unspecified date. The High Court admitted the appeal and heard it finally on 18-06-2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4, Section 11, Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in dismissing the reference for default without considering the merits, and remands the matt...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Writ Petition in Loan Dispute — Civil Nature of Transaction Precludes Criminal Liability. Failure to Repay Loan Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC Without Evidence of Entrustment or Decepti...