Search Results for "Old Land Acquisition Act 1894"

173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose. Acquisition of Petitioners' Land for Archaeological Museum Set Aside as Notification Did Not Specify Public Purpose Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Nidasheshi Veeranna and Gali Prakash, along with Gali Shivabasappa in the connected petition, owned agricultural lands in Sy.No.4/1 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Lapsed as Compensation Was Deposited with Collector But Not Paid to Landowners, Failing Statutory Requirement.

The Supreme Court disposed of a bunch of appeals involving common questions of law and fact regarding land acquisition proceedings. The background inv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to acquire reserved land within the statutory period results in automatic lapsing of reservation and release of land to the owner.

The petitioner, Siddharam Shivappa Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Claim as Time-Barred Due to 37-Year Delay. Challenge to Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Rejected for Unexplained Laches.

The petitioners, Babasaheb Eknath Wakchaure, Sunil Namdeo Wakchaure, and Balasaheb Gangadhar Wakchaure, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...