Search Results for "Mumbai head office"

2121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Department's Appeal in Permanent Establishment Tax Dispute Under India-Korea DTAA. Court Upholds ITAT's Finding of Permanent Establishment but Remands Profit Attribution for Fresh Assessment Due to Insufficient Material.

The dispute arose from the taxability of income attributable to a permanent establishment set up in India by Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., a Sout...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Two Public Interest Litigations Challenging Joint Venture Agreement for Transfer of 20 Acres of Land at Film City, Goregaon. The Court Decided the Common Challenge to the Agreement in Both Petitions, Leaving Other Reliefs for Separate Adjudication.

The High Court of Bombay heard two public interest litigations filed by different sets of petitioners, both challenging the actions of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Territorial Jurisdiction in Section 11 Arbitration Application Over Insurance Claim Dispute. Court Finds Entire Cause of Action Arose in Telangana and Head Office Presence in Mumbai Alone Did Not Confer Jurisdiction Under Clause XII of Letters Patent.

Two applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were filed before the Bombay High Court seeking appointment of a sole ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice by Municipal Corporation and Defence Authorities. Examines if NOC from Defence is Required for Building Completion Under Town Planning and Municipal Acts.

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment of a Category A cessed building known as Rashid Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Directs State Government to Expedite Land Allotment for New High Court Complex in PIL on Court Infrastructure. Need for Adequate Judicial Infrastructure Recognized as Fundamental to Rule of Law; State Obligated to Provide Suitable Premises.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by an advocate practicing at the Bombay High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State Governmen...