Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Voting Rights for APMC Representatives in Legislative Council Elections. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Not a Local Authority Under Article 171 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Radhakishan Deorao Pathade, Chairman of the Super Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Aurangabad, filed a writ petition seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recount Order in APMC Election. Commissioner's order for rescrutiny and recount of all ballot papers set aside as there was no material irregularity in counting.

The petitioner, Milind Shreeram Tayade, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Amravati, from a seat reserved...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recount Order in APMC Election — Commissioner's Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Milind Shreeram Tayade, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Amravati, from a seat reserved...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Postponement of APMC Elections Due to Non-Application of Mind. State Government's Order Under Section 14(3) and (3A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasons.

The petitioners, who are agriculturists and office-bearers of cooperative societies that are members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APM...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Administrator for APMC Ghatanji Due to Expiry of Managing Committee's Term. Postponement of Elections Does Not Imply Extension of Tenure Under Section 15A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...