Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling and Holdings) Act"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Revision After 15 Years Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Anurat Jadhav, a resident of Salimba, filed a return under Section 12 of the Ceiling Act on 1 December 1975, showing total holding of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Notice Under Section 17(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Violation of Natural Justice. Notice Issued Without Opportunity of Hearing to Land Holder Declared Surplus by SLDT.

The petitioner, Tukaram s/o Dajiba Harkal, a resident of Renakhali, Taluka Pathri, District Parbhani, was the original land holder in proceedings unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Land Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 12(6) of the Act.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landholder Babasaheb Balwant Bawane, challenged the order dated 30th April 1993 passed by the Chairman, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act Due to 16-Year Delay. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, and a Delay of 16 Years Is Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Ansiram Gundiram Gavane, was a landholder in Parbhani, Maharashtra. In 1975, he filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...