KAHC010026042017_1
9 Mar 2018...
Search Results for "Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000"
97 result(s) found
Found 97 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.
21 Jun 2016The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Vice-Chancellor Appointment Under UGC Regulations and Maharashtra Universities Act. Challenge Focuses on Applicability of UGC Regulations 2010 and Discretion of Chancellor in Selecting Vice-Chancellor.
9 Aug 2011The petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai by ...
- 11
High Court
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 20304 OF 2019
25 Jul 2019The petitioners, engineering graduates from universities other than the University of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to University’s Denial of Permanent Approval to Contractually Appointed Lecturers. Petitioners Alleged Violation of UGC Exemption Norms After Acquiring M.Phil During Continuous Service.
29 Oct 2015The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by three lecturers—Ram Phawade, Shivaji Shinde, and Shrimant Bhalke—aga...
- 34
High Court
High Court Examines Validity of Clauses in PG Medical Admission Procedure Barring Deemed University MBBS Graduates; Holds Classification Based on Deemed University Status Needs Scrutiny Under Article 14. Court Analyzes Whether Clauses 7.2.1, 7.6, and 7.12.4 of PGM CET 2009 Violate Article 14 of Constitution of India Due to Arbitrary Classification.
23 Apr 2010The dispute arose from the admission procedure for postgraduate medical courses (PGM CET 2009) in Maharashtra, which contained clauses 7.2.1, 7.6 and ...
- 31
High Court
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Pay Revision for Unaided Private Engineering College. Government Resolutions directing retrospective implementation of 5th and 6th Pay Commission recommendations held not binding on unaided private institutions, but prospective implementation required.
7 Sep 2018The petitioners, D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and its managing trust D.Y. Patil Pratisthan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court ch...
- 228
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
30 Jul 2024The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...
- 451
High Court
- 36
