High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 132
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a writ petition (Public Interest Litigation) filed by 25 petitioners against the State of Karnataka, its officials, and a large number of impleaded respondents. The case appears to challenge the recruitment and selection process conducted by the Karnataka Public Service Commission and state authorities. No factual background, legal issues, submissions, or court decision are included in the available excerpt. The procedural history indicates that several respondents were impleaded over time by court orders dated 12.08.2013, 19.02.2014, 20.08.2014, and 16.09.2014. The nature of the dispute, specific relief sought, and outcome of the petition remain unknown from the provided text.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010069112012_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (06) 30

W.P.No.27674/2012 c/w W.P.Nos.41366/2012, 27730/2012, 43718 & 43720 – 43732/2012, 4297/2013 & 1733/2013 (GM – PIL)

2016-06-21

N.Kumar, B.Veerappa

M.B.Nargund, VikramPhadke

Khaleel Ahmed K.R. and Others

State of Karnataka and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation before the High Court of Karnataka concerning recruitment and selection to state services.

Procedural History

The High Court, by orders dated 12.08.2013, 19.02.2014, 20.08.2014, and 16.09.2014, impleaded various respondents including Hidayatullah, Mohamed Rafi Pasha, Bhaskar Naik, and others as per the case progression.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — Lower Appellate Court Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits. Remand Under Order XLI Rule 23 CPC Requires Satisfaction of Conditions; Appellate Court Cannot Remand Wit...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State's Authority on Seniority Determination in Service Rules Case — Temporary Service Not Counted.